Page 150 of the Conservative Platform promises to make work pay for low-income seniors. They propose to double the Canada Worker Benefit (CWB) to a maximum of $2800 for singles and $5000 for couples for all of the working poor, including seniors receiving public pensions.
This promise is described as a “$1 per hour pay raise for low-income seniors” choosing to supplement their retirement income through paid employment.
The problem is that many working low-income seniors who receive the income-tested Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) on top of Old Age Security (OAS) are very unlikely to benefit from the higher CWB. The Conservatives do not seem to have taken into account interactions of the CWB rules with the GIS rules.
CWB benefits are paid to workers with qualifying low earnings, based on family income. For singles, benefits are reduced after adjusted net income is more than $13,064 and is lost completely for those with incomes of more than $24,573 (the comparable figures for couples are $17,348 and $37,173).
The current maximum income from Old Age Security and the Guaranteed Income Supplement combined is $18,746 for singles and $32,424 for couples.
Many seniors collecting OAS/GIS benefits thus have incomes that exceed the threshold for phasing out of existing CWB benefits. This problem would be exacerbated by doubling the CWB. Basically, the incomes of many if not most working seniors would be unchanged.
Note that seniors are allowed to earn $5,000 per year ($10,000 for couples) before losing any GIS benefit. A clawback of 50% is then applied.
If the goal is to help low-income working seniors, a better way would be to increase the earnings exemption.
Further reading: Canada's Working poor and the Working Tax Benefit.
The Poverty Reduction Strategy announced by the federal government at the end of August proposes that an official Canadian poverty line be set for the first time and enshrined in legislation; and that official targets be set to reduce the poverty rate by 20% by 2020, and by 50% by 2030.Read more
As expected, the federal budget delivered on the Liberal promise to leave the age of eligibility for Old Age Security (OAS) and Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) retirement benefits at age sixty five. The Harper government had previously decided to phase in an increase to age sixty seven.
Many pundits have argued that the eligibility age should rise in line with longer life expectancy. They say that a higher retirement age would reduce the growing cost of the OAS/GIS program, and will boost the economy by pushing seniors to work longer.Read more
The new Liberal government is on track to seriously address the growing problem of poverty in old age. But their election promises need some critical reconsideration.Read more
A recent study from the Fraser Institute claims boosting premiums to pay for higher Canada Pension Plan benefits would not work, since individuals would simply save less in RRSPs and other individual savings vehicles. Thus there would be no overall increase in retirement income, and individuals would have less flexible access to their savings because CPP contributions are effectively locked in.Read more
The Oct. 19 Globe and Mail editorial supporting expansion of the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) got it exactly right. The CPP is “one of the country’s great public policy successes” and “the best [savings plan] we’ve got.”
Notwithstanding evidence that many middle-income earners will face a sharp decline in living standards in retirement as a result of the erosion of employer pension plans and very low rates of private savings, the Harper government has refused to endorse the emerging provincial government consensus in favour of CPP expansion. The main argument against seems to be that the required increase in contributions (about 3 per cent of earnings) would amount to a damaging tax increase.Read more